首页> 外文OA文献 >Exemestane Versus Anastrozole in Postmenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer: NCIC CTG MA.27—A Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial
【2h】

Exemestane Versus Anastrozole in Postmenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer: NCIC CTG MA.27—A Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial

机译:绝经后早期乳腺癌妇女的依西美坦与阿那曲唑比较:NCIC CTG MA.27-一项随机对照的III期临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE\ud\udIn patients with hormone-dependent postmenopausal breast cancer, standard adjuvant therapy involves 5 years of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole. The steroidal inhibitor exemestane is partially non-cross-resistant with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors and is a mild androgen and could prove superior to anastrozole regarding efficacy and toxicity, specifically with less bone loss.\ud\udPATIENTS AND METHODS\ud\udWe designed an open-label, randomized, phase III trial of 5 years of exemestane versus anastrozole with a two-sided test of superiority to detect a 2.4% improvement with exemestane in 5-year event-free survival (EFS). Secondary objectives included assessment of overall survival, distant disease-free survival, incidence of contralateral new primary breast cancer, and safety.\ud\udRESULTS\ud\udIn the study, 7,576 women (median age, 64.1 years) were enrolled. At median follow-up of 4.1 years, 4-year EFS was 91% for exemestane and 91.2% for anastrozole (stratified hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.18; P = .85). Overall, distant disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were also similar. In all, 31.6% of patients discontinued treatment as a result of adverse effects, concomitant disease, or study refusal. Osteoporosis/osteopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, vaginal bleeding, and hypercholesterolemia were less frequent on exemestane, whereas mild liver function abnormalities and rare episodes of atrial fibrillation were less frequent on anastrozole. Vasomotor and musculoskeletal symptoms were similar between arms.\ud\udCONCLUSION\ud\udThis first comparison of steroidal and nonsteroidal classes of aromatase inhibitors showed neither to be superior in terms of breast cancer outcomes as 5-year initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer by two-way test. Less toxicity on bone is compatible with one hypothesis behind MA.27 but requires confirmation. Exemestane should be considered another option as up-front adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
机译:目的\绝经\绝经后激素依赖型乳腺癌患者,标准辅助治疗涉及5年的非甾体芳香酶抑制剂阿那曲唑和来曲唑。类固醇抑制剂依西美坦与非类固醇芳香化酶抑制剂部分不交叉耐药,并且是温和的雄激素,在功效和毒性方面,特别是在减少骨质流失方面,可以证明优于阿那曲唑。\ ud \ ud患者和方法\ ud \ ud我们设计了一种开放式标记的,随机,III期5年的依西美坦与阿那曲唑临床试验,并进行了一项双面优势试验,以检测依西美坦在5年无事件生存(EFS)中改善了2.4%。次要目标包括总体生存率,无病生存率,对侧新发原发性乳腺癌的发生率和安全性的评估。该研究纳入了7576名妇女(中位年龄为64.1岁)。在中位随访4.1年时,依西美坦的4年EFS为91%,阿那曲唑为91.2%(分层危险比为1.02; 95%CI为0.87至1.18; P = .85)。总体而言,远距离无病生存期和特定疾病生存期也相似。总共有31.6%的患者由于不良反应,伴随疾病或研究拒绝而终止治疗。在依西美坦上,骨质疏松症/骨减少症,高甘油三酯血症,阴道出血和高胆固醇血症的发生频率较低,而阿那曲唑对轻度肝功能异常和罕见的心房颤动发作的频率较低。手臂之间的血管舒缩和肌肉骨骼症状相似。\ ud \ ud结论\ ud \ ud对甾体和非甾体类芳香化酶抑制剂的首次比较显示,在乳腺癌的结局方面,作为绝经后乳腺癌的5年初始辅助治疗,两者均无优势。双向测试。对骨骼的毒性较小,符合MA.27背后的一种假设,但需要证实。对于绝经后激素受体阳性的乳腺癌,应将依西美坦作为另一种辅助疗法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号